Despite errors, there is no question that climate science is fundamentally sound

| More
mikeg Vinuta Gopal, a climate campaigner at Greenpeace India, just sent the following out in an email. I think it lays out the issue quite well, and figured I'd share it here.
The media has been buzzing about the IPCC's Himalayan glacier controversy.

The international climate panel headed by Dr. Rajendra Pachauri won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 for a ground-breaking report on climate change. Several small errors have now surfaced in the 3,000-page report.

If you're wondering what the news reports mean for climate change, here are some answers. Please spread the word to your family, friends, and co-workers.

1. Do the U.N. climate panel's errors mean there is no threat from climate change?

No, the dire threat from climate change is not in question. The panel's errors were only related to the intensity of climate change. There are in fact only two real mistakes that have been found so far and neither necessitate any change to the basic premise of human-induced climate change.

For over two decades, scientists have consistently found that climate change is happening, and it's caused by human activity.

2. Why is there so much furor about these errors?

Over the past 20 years, the U.N. climate panel has been attacked again and again by the fossil fuel industry and by politicians who are determined to discredit climate change science and continue on an unsustainable development pathway which would ensure dire consequences for this earth.

3. Are the Himalayan glaciers melting or not?

In 2007, the U.N. climate panel reported that Himalayan glaciers might vanish by 2035. The specific year turned out to be based on a flawed study, and the panel has corrected the error.

The Himalayan glaciers are retreating, but the exact rate of retreat is still uncertain. India's Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh was one of the first to argue that the 2035 forecast was "not based on an iota of scientific evidence," but he confirms the Himalayan glaciers "are indeed receding and the rate is cause for great concern."

4. Who will be impacted by climate change?

Everyone. Lesser developed countries and small island states will be hit hardest and fastest.

But rich nations are not immune to the violent weather, drought, disease, famine, mass migrations, and wars that will be caused if we don't stop climate change.

5. What is Greenpeace’s call on climate change?

The science is clear. Climate change is real, is happening now and is caused by people. The solution is clean energy, smart use of our power and forest protection.

Since lots of people are wondering about the media stories, please forward this mail to your family, friends and co-workers.

Thanks a billion!

Vinuta Gopal
Climate Campaigner
Greenpeace India


P.S. If you want more details, check out this thorough analysis at RealClimate.org.

Comments (2)

  • Permalink Jason H. on February 24, 2010
    1. Do the U.N. climate panel's errors mean there is no threat from climate change?

    Yes, this is just the latest in lies perpetrated by the UN, IPCC, CRU,.... What about Climategate e-mails and computer programming codes? If not so bad why did Phil Jones quit? Errors (lies) keep on coming.

    2. Why is there so much furor about these errors?

    Because these are not the first and most certainly will not be the last in a long list of lies.

    3. Are the Himalayan glaciers melting or not?

    I would suspect that that glaciers grow and recede through time. One would have to assume if this planet is living it would be in an ever changing state.

    4. Who will be impacted by climate change?

    This is the first thing you got correct. Everyone is impacted by climate change because the climate does change spring, summer, winter, fall. Let me guess the huge winter storms int he eastern US are climate change. I suppose since it is freezing now that is why you had to change from 'Global Warming' to 'Climate Change' because that lie wasn't working.

    5. What is Greenpeace’s call on climate change?

    The science is NOT clear. Look at the over 31,000 American scientist and 9,000 PhDs who disagree with you. http://www.petitionproject.org/ read their summary or peer-reviewed research.

    The earth's surface temps have been on a warming trend for since the little ice age a few hundred years ago but is still not close to the medieval period temps. So if global warming or climate change whatever you want to call it is caused by man than how was it warmer in the Medieval Period? Let me guess they burned a lot of coal back then too?

    Stop towing the industry line. This movement is co-opted by big government to impose a tax on the entire world to be collected by an international bank. Read the Copenhagen Treaty Draft. Do you truly believe a global banks will help out your cause or any other?

    Jason
  • Permalink Jason H. on February 24, 2010
    1. Do the U.N. climate panel's errors mean there is no threat from climate change?

    Yes, this is just the latest in lies perpetrated by the UN, IPCC, CRU,.... What about Climategate e-mails and computer programming codes? If not so bad why did Phil Jones quit? Errors (lies) keep on coming.

    2. Why is there so much furor about these errors?

    Because these are not the first and most certainly will not be the last in a long list of lies.

    3. Are the Himalayan glaciers melting or not?

    I would suspect that that glaciers grow and recede through time. One would have to assume if this planet is living it would be in an ever changing state.

    4. Who will be impacted by climate change?

    This is the first thing you got correct. Everyone is impacted by climate change because the climate does change spring, summer, winter, fall. Let me guess the huge winter storms int he eastern US are climate change. I suppose since it is freezing now that is why you had to change from 'Global Warming' to 'Climate Change' because that lie wasn't working.

    5. What is Greenpeace’s call on climate change?

    The science is NOT clear. Look at the over 31,000 American scientist and 9,000 PhDs who disagree with you. http://www.petitionproject.org/ read their summary or peer-reviewed research.

    The earth's surface temps have been on a warming trend for since the little ice age a few hundred years ago but is still not close to the medieval period temps. So if global warming or climate change whatever you want to call it is caused by man than how was it warmer in the Medieval Period? Let me guess they burned a lot of coal back then too?

    Stop towing the industry line. This movement is co-opted by big government to impose a tax on the entire world to be collected by an international bank. Read the Copenhagen Treaty Draft. Do you truly believe a global banks will help out your cause or any other?

    Jason
  •  

Leave a comment

You must have a Greenpeace or Facebook account and be logged in to post comments.
Please log in or create an account to share your comments
or connect with facebook: Connect with Facebook

About Me

mikeg
San Francisco, CA USA

I am a Web Editor for Greenpeace based out of San Francisco.


Invite mikeg to your Personal Activist Network

Syndicate XML

Take Online Action with Greenpeace

Categories